The first set of forcing data was produced as part of the ARM Operational Data products and uses objective analysis to produce the horizontal advection data from data gathered by radiosondes and wind profilers at the ARM SGP Site. This data is currently stored at CSU. The second set is produced by Prof. Minghua Zhang at SUNY Stonybrook and can be accessed via ftp. This product is derived using a constrained variational scheme. In addition to the objective analysis techniques used by the first data set, heat and moisture fluxes at the surface and top of the atmosphere are used to constrain the data to conserve the column-integrated mass, moisture, static energy and momentum. A manuscript which includes a detailed description of this procedure has been submitted to the Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences for publication (Zhang and Lin, 1996).
Two versions of our SCM were used to test the different forcing data sets.
Cloud liquid water (CLW) was not included as a variable in the first version of
the SCM, while in the second version it was included as a prognostic variable.
We ran each version our SCM for a period of 15 days (Oct 26 - Nov 9, 1994)
during the Fall 1994 Intensive Observing Period (IOP) using both sets
of forcing data. Graphs of the temperature and specific humidity difference
(SCM - Observed) are shown below.
Figures 1-4: Model version without cloud liquid water
Figures 5-8: Model version with cloud liquid water
(Click on the graph for a larger image).
ARM Forcing without CLW Temperature Difference |
Zhang Forcing without CLW Temperature Difference |
Figure 1 | Figure 2 |
ARM Forcing without CLW Humidity Difference |
Zhang Forcing without CLW Humidity Difference |
Figure 3 | Figure 4 |
ARM Forcing with CLW Temperature Difference |
Zhang Forcing with CLW Temperature Difference |
Figure 5 | Figure 6 |
ARM Forcing with CLW Humidity Difference |
Zhang Forcing with CLW Humidity Difference |
Figure 7 | Figure 8 |
Model temperature errors are significantly reduced when the constrained variational forcing data (Zhang) is used compared to the standard objectively analyzed products (ARM). There appears to be very little, if any, improvement in the model humidity fields when the variational forcing data is used. It is important to remember that the model is not perfect, and even with exact forcing data, there will be some difference between model results and reality.